- #SOLARWINDS NETWORK PERFORMANCE MONITOR VS PRTG INSTALL#
- #SOLARWINDS NETWORK PERFORMANCE MONITOR VS PRTG UPGRADE#
More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Cons →
You have to build your own with manuscripts and things like that." In the application layer, it has some very basic stuff. That's one area they need to work on." "It lacks a user experience for measuring things like the end-to-end time for which a user waits for a specific response in the system. I have some customers who are trying to export their report to an Excel format, but it is not possible because they said any report that has been done from the web console cannot be exported to Excel, but most of the customers need to export their reports to Excel. If they can bring back the report writer, then most users will actually be comfortable. That's the key area within it to improve on the reporting. I would like them to bring back the report writer. So, they have removed the report writer for the backend reports, and we are making use of the web console, but most of the users are not finding it very interesting to use the frontend reports.
There is the report writer, which is the backend, and we also have web reports, which are on the console. To date, nobody can complete it on time, so the production environment is sitting idle." "Reporting is the only thing with which we currently have challenges. It's easy to deploy, but upgrades take forever.
#SOLARWINDS NETWORK PERFORMANCE MONITOR VS PRTG UPGRADE#
So AppDynamics takes a lot of time and effort to install, but you can upgrade it in minutes. AppDynamics is harder to deploy but easier to upgrade. Microsoft SCOM has better server monitoring." "It should also be easier to upgrade SolarWinds. The types of dashboards that you get in terms of the graphs on offer aren't ideal right now." "SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor could improve the server monitoring and the web application monitoring features are not good. "SAM's software-defined network monitoring capability is also low and could be improved." "The stability, flexibility, and ease of use could be improved." "In terms of the dashboards on offer, they should work to improve them. More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Pros → You can filter the kinds of alerts you want to receive as well.
Notifications are sent via email to technicians.
The threshold gets configured automatically, so it's no longer necessary to configure it manually every time." "It's good at monitoring system-specific things like ports, services." "The solution has good alerts. We can go in-depth into services and processes." "The most valuable feature of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is the network devices' performance monitor is the best." "SolarWinds SAM has provided us with dynamic thresholds based on historical trends and requirements. It is not necessarily just the server alone in terms of the CPU or the memory. All we had to do was put on the devices we wanted to monitor." "Monitoring of processes and services is the most valuable feature.
#SOLARWINDS NETWORK PERFORMANCE MONITOR VS PRTG INSTALL#
The AppDynamics console is more complex because it's a more feature-rich solution, so it's not easy for somebody to pick it up." "The initial setup was relatively easy, and we didn't have to install anything. SolarWinds is more intuitive and user-friendly than AppDynamics. "The component and cable monitoring are good.
0 kommentar(er)
